Risk-scoring model to predict one-year major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: The aim of the present study was to develop a scoring system for predicting 1-year major adverse cardiac events [MACE], including mortality, target vessel or target lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and non-fatal myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]

Methods: The data were extracted from a single center PCI registry. The score was created based on the clinical, procedural, and laboratory characteristics of 8206 patients who underwent PCI between April 2004 and October 2009. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI between November 2009 and February 2011 [n= 2875] were included as a validation data set

Results: Diabetes mellitus, increase in the creatinine level, decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction, presentation with the acute coronary syndrome, number of diseased vessels, primary PCI, PCI on the left anterior descending artery and saphenous vein graft, and stent type and diameter were identified as the predictors of the outcome and used to develop the score [R[²] = 0.795]. The models had adequate goodness of fit [Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic; p value = 0.601] and acceptable ability of discrimination [c-statistics = 0.63]. The score categorized the individual patients as low-, moderate-, and high-risk for the occurrence of MACE. The validation of the model indicated a good agreement between the observed and expected risks

Conclusion: An individual risk-scoring system based on both clinical and procedural variables can be used conveniently to predict 1-year MACE after PCI. Risk classification based on this score can assist physicians in decision-making and postprocedural health care

Success rate, procedural complications and clinical outcomes of coronary interventions in octogenarians: a case-control study

Clinical trials of revascularization have routinely under-enrolled elderly subjects. Thus, symptom relief and improved survival might not apply to elderly patients, in whom the risk of mortality and disability from revascularization procedures seems to be high and co-morbidity is more prevalent. The present case control study was performed to draw a comparison in terms of the procedural success, procedural and in-hospital complications, and major adverse cardiac events [MACE] in a one-year follow-up of octogenarians [age >/= 80 years] with a selected matched younger control group in the Tehran Heart Center Angioplasty Registry. According to the Tehran Heart Center Interventional Registry of 9, 250 patients with a minimum follow-up period of one year between April 1993 and February 2010, 157 percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] procedures were performed in 112 octogenarians. Additionally, 336 younger patients [459 PCI procedures] were selected from the database as the propensity-score matched controls. There were 147 [93.6%] and 441 [96.1%] successful PCI procedures in the elderly group and control group, respectively [p value = 0.204]. Procedural complications were seen in 5 [3.2%] of the elderly group and 16 [3.5%] of the control group [p value = 0.858]. Totally, 7 [6.3%] in-hospital complications occurred in the elderly group and 22 [6.8%] in the control group [p value = 0.866]. One-year MACE was seen in 9 [9.1%] of the elderly and 18 [5.8%] of the control group [p value = 0.26]. Procedural success and complications, in-hospital complications, and one-year MACE were not significantly different between our two study groups. Therefore, age alone should not be used as the sole criterion when considering revascularization procedures. Furthermore, PCI should not be refused in octogenarians if indicated

One-year clinical outcomes of ultra long apollo polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex, long coronary artery lesions

For all the wealth of research comparing the efficacy of the different types of the drug-eluting stent [DES] such as sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents, there is still a dearth of data on the different brands of each DES type. We aimed to investigate the one-year clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events [MACE], of the use of the ultra long Apollo paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with long atherosclerotic coronary artery lesions. According to a retrospective review of the Tehran Heart Center Registry of Interventional Cardiology, a single-center nonrandomized computerized data registry in which all adult patients who undergo single or multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] are enrolled without any specific exclusion criteria, the mixed use of long Apollo paclitaxel-eluting stents and other types of the DES as well as myocardial infarction within forty-eight hours prior to the procedure was excluded. In total, 122 patients were enrolled in the study, and their baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were obtained. In addition, the patients' follow-up data and, most importantly, MACE during a one-year period after intervention were recorded. The mean follow-up duration was 14.1 +/- 3.8 months. The one-year clinical follow-up data were obtained in 95.9% of all the patients. The incidence of MACE was 5.7% during the entire study period. There was 1 death, which occurred during the initial days after PCI. The incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction was 2.5% [3 cases], including one patient who underwent target vessel revascularization seven months later. Also, 3 patients with single-vessel disease and in-stent restenosis underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between five to ten months later. Our results showed that the Apollo paclitaxel-eluting stent might be regarded as a safe and effective treatment for long coronary lesions

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on saphenous vein graft and native coronary vessels

The optimal target for revascularization in patients with history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG] is unclear. This study was designed to compare the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] on saphenous vein grafts [SVG] and that on native vessels in patients with previous CABG in terms of major adverse cardiac events [MACE]. The study drew upon data on consecutive patients hospitalized for PCI and MACE rate during a nine-month follow- up period. The patients were divided according to the target vessel for PCI into two groups: SVG and native vessel. Between 2003 and 2007, 226 patients underwent PCI 6.57 +/- 4.55 years after CABG. Their mean age was 59.52 +/- 9.38 years, and 176 [77.9%] were male. PCI was performed on the SVG in 63 [27.9%] patients and on the native coronary artery in the rest. During a nine-month follow-up period, 9 [4%] patients suffered MACE; the prevalence of MACE was not significantly different between the SVG group [4.8%] and the native vessel group [4.9%], [p value = 0.999]. PCI on grafted and native vessels did not affect MACE in patients undergoing PCI after CABG

Predictors of Long-term Outcome in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a single center registry [THCR]

This study sought to access differences in long-term [9 months] outcomes between Acute Coronary Syndrome [ACS] patients who undergo early intervention compared to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] in stable and refractory conditions. Data originated from Tehran Heart Center Registry- interventional cardiology [THCR-IC] and consisted of 1267 patients divided into two categories; 227 patients had features corresponding to acute coronary syndromes [17.9%] and 1040 patients suffered from stable angina [82.1%]. They were admitted between April 3, 2003 and April 25, 2004. The clinical success rate of PCI was higher in ACS [97% vs. 94%; P=0.037], while In-hospital complications was similar in both groups. During the follow-up period, clinical restenosis was not significantly different and the overall number of re-interventions caused by restenosis or progression was not more frequent in ACS patients. Also, 1.3% of ACS and 0.4% of SA patients died, but the difference was not statistically significant [P=0.16]. Finally, Major Adverse Cardiac Events [MACE] showed no significant difference [5.2% vs. 3.9%; P=0.42]. Multivariate analysis showed that female sex [OR=25.6; P=0.003] and previous history of PCI [OR=8.4; P=0.016] were the only strong independent risk factors for major adverse cardiac events. Analyzing ACS patient outcomes using Mantel-Hanzel analysis showed that the female sex was the only factor which strongly increased the incidence of MACE. Both ACS and SA patients who underwent coronary intervention had similar in-hospital and composite major adverse cardiac events, nevertheless female gender must be considered as an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiac events especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome who undergo PCI